Material and methods
To analyze stereotypes out-of subgroups of females and men, i earliest conducted a good pilot data in order to gather a listing of latest gender subgroups inside the Norwegian people.
Pilot Research
Players (N = 60) were approached in public areas around cardio off Bergen, Norway, and you may asked to take part in a preliminary questionnaire about which organizations they sense that ladies and you can boys inside neighborhood is divided into. Among the many people, 50.0% have been females. A good forty-eight.3% had been guys (you to definitely fellow member didn’t answer fully the question regarding gender/intercourse dos ) together with mean ages is actually (SD = , diversity 18–79). Most (ninety.0%) didn’t have an enthusiastic immigrant background. Others had sometimes immigrated on their own (6.7%) otherwise was Norwegian produced to 1 otherwise a couple immigrant mothers (1.7%). One new member failed to address the backdrop concern.
This new instruction toward users was as: ‘There are many different “types” of females in the current area. Excite jot down as numerous different varieties of lady (age.grams., mothers of children, businesswomen) as you’re able remember.’ Other page is actually leftover blank to your new member to write into. Into a different page, an equivalent knowledge talking about form of people is actually shown. The order out of demonstration try counterbalanced so half the participants listed people very first, others half noted men basic.
Typically, the participants indexed 7.28 different types of female (SD = cuatro.07, assortment 0–21) and you can seven.42 different types of boys (SD = 4.47, assortment 0–24). Three conditions were used to determine which teams might possibly be chosen just like the stimulus groups in the main research: (a) the group must be said by the at least four professionals, (b) i needed to have communities off some other public jobs and you will categories (age.g., teams outlined by family relations and you can elite group opportunities and you can intimate orientations), and (c) we planned to make sure we had synchronous female and male subgroups (e.grams., male political figures and females political leaders, single mothers, and you will solitary dads) so you can facilitate evaluations of men and women occupying a similar public part and group. Our choice you to definitely a teams is stated by five participants is actually advised of the prior published really works (e.g., Lee and you can Fiske, 2006; Dentro de mais aussi al., 2013) however, has also been practical in the same manner you to a more strict standards do limit the amount of teams provided and a more easy you might encompass too many teams to get ranked.
Considering this type of standards, 19 male subgroups (company men, fathers out-of young children, police- and firemen, bachelors, steeped males, performs males, delicate guys, men youngsters, outdoorsy boys, unmarried dads, convenient guys, single boys, male leadership, old boys, gay guys, men teachers, stylish people, male political figures, datingmentor.org/pl/heated-affairs-recenzja and you can rockers) and you may twenty-two subgroups of women (unmarried parents, women political figures, industry females, moms and dads from children, nurses, feminists, lady children, outdoorsy women, coaches (the feminine style of the expression in the Norwegian was used), lesbians, old lady, writers, single people, immigrant ladies, manly females, girls, lady designers, exercise girls, ladies academics, trend girls, housewives, and you will girls management) was chose.
Choosing organizations in part considering their salience about pilot try isn’t instead of dangers. Just like the Fiske ainsi que al. (2002) explained, both organizations eliciting aversion plus in-organizations could be less inclined to are available. I understand that our directory of communities is limited in many ways: Such, the list doesn’t consist of an entire selection of sexual orientations (age.grams., bisexual women or men is actually excluded, heterosexuality wasn’t stated about airplane pilot and you may allegedly pulled getting granted), and you can “immigrants” were used unlike specifying specific ethnicities otherwise regions from source. We are not suggesting that our checklist is member of your own subgroups that women and boys will get get into. Although not, new organizations picked was salient regarding Norwegian context, and several of the included intercourse subgroups was understood in the earlier in the day lookup various other federal contexts (Athenstaedt ainsi que al., 2008).